20 Sep 2024
While tidying up loose ends in the tree after the recent addition of new Chambers ancestors I recalled that years ago I had transcribed some entries from the Suffolk Hearth Tax of 1674 and I wondered if any of the new people would be listed. I found my old hand written notes and did see a James Chambers and a Mary Chambers listed for Ubbeston. I then found that a copy of that book was available on the Internet Archive, which was a welcome surprise: Suffolk in 1674 : being the hearth tax returns by S. H. A. H. (Sydenham Henry Augustus Hervey).
In Ubbeston, a James Chambers is listed as paying for two hearths. In the certified section, which contains people certified as exempt due to circumstances, is a Mary Chambers listed for two hearths, grouped with Robert Peck also with two hearths. I presume this is a single house shared between two families. Also in the certified section is a Francis Rush, two hearths, with someone just called Chambers, certified for two hearths.
None of these people are immediately identifiable. The Suffolk Burial Index lists a burial for a James Chambers in Ubbeston in 1684 but no other information is shown. It also lists a burial there for Mary Chambers, spinster in 1676. I would have expected Jeremy/Jeremiah Chambers to be listed. Perhaps he is the unnamed Chambers living with Francis Rush.
I will return to this book later, because while looking at my old hand written Hearth Tax extracts I noticed, on another page, some extracts relating to the Suffolk Witch Trials taken from Suffolk Roots Jan and Jul 1980. I’ll reproduce it all here:
- Chambers, John (witch), 1645, Bramford
- Chambers, Widow (witch), 1693, Ubbeston
- Mayhew, Robert (witness), 1645, Rushmere
- Brooks, Sir Robert, 1645, Westleton
- Martin, Mrs (witch), 1645, Bramford
Now we have a link to Ubbeston, the Chambers witch becomes very intriguing. I Googled and found a page on the Ubbeston Parish website: Widow Chambers, the ‘witch’ 1693
In 1693 our very own local ‘witch’ emerged. History only records her as Widow Chambers but it is very possible her name is Rachel (see below). Apparently, she believed she had killed her husband, Jeremiah, and Lady Blois by witchcraft even though the Blois and Kemp families (see below) denied this. Widow Chambers was arrested and taken to Beccles Gaol. Torture had long been outlawed as a means of obtaining a confession, but this didn’t prevent her gaolers from ‘walking’ her for three days. For three days the poor woman was deprived of sleep and walked incessantly. During that time, she even confessed to killing people who were still alive! After three days of such harsh treatment, Widow Chambers died.
It is very possible that her husband was Jeremiah Chambers, who was born in Ubbeston on 23rd April 1626 and was buried in the parish churchyard on 7th December 1692. Jeremiah had married a Rachel Strut in her home village of Cratfield in 1650, making her Rachel Chambers, recently widowed, when arrested.
Rachel Strut is my 7x great grandmother. I had wondered why she had been buried in Beccles while her abode was Ubbeston and this explains it!
The article continues:
The Lady Blois, referred to in the account by Francis Hutchinson quoted below and identified as having died at the right time, is most likely to be Mary Kemp, wife of the politician, Sir Charles Blois, (1657-1738), First Baronet of Grundisburgh and later resident at Cockfield Hall, Yoxford.
Mary was born on March 20th 1659, oldest daughter of Sir Robert Kemp, Second Baronet of Gissing Hall, Norfolk and Ubbeston Hall and Mary Sone. (Mary Sone’s parents had built the original Ubbeston Hall.)
Mary married Charles Blois in 1680 in Ubbeston Church. She died 18th January 1693. There is reference to her illness in parliamentary papers, which say on 13th January 1693, Charles was given leave of absence his lady being very ill.
Widow Chambers became famous when included in Francis Hutchinson’s pamphlet of 1720, attempting to debunk witchcraft.
The Minister describes Widow Chambers as a diligent industrious poor woman and tells how her accusers had asked her, as an experiment, if she had killed certain people, whom they knew to be still alive, and how she had agreed she had.
Historian Wallace Notestein, writing in 1911 describes 1718, the year that marked the publication of Francis Hutchinson’s notable attack, as epoch-making. He believed Hutchinson levelled a final and deadly blow at the dying superstition. Hutchinson’s words: Widow Chambers of Upaston in Suffolk, a diligent industrious poor Woman, committed to Beccles Goal [sic] upon an accusation of Witchcraft, and died in Prison before her Tryal. After she had been walk’d betwixt two, she confessed a great many things of herself, and in particular she said, she had kill’d her Husband, and the Lady Blois; though the near relations of that good Lady were satisfied that she died a fair Death, without any hurt from that poor Woman; and some for Experiment sake ask’d her, if she had not killed such and such; and she confessed she had, though the Persons were then living.
1693, when Widow Chambers of Upaston was arrested for witchcraft and taken to Beccles Gaol, was the year after the Witches of Salem trials. The theory now stands that these women (and men) really did believe they had supernatural powers because they were affected by ergot growing on rye when there was a wet harvest. LSD is a chemical form of ergot. Salem was a rye growing area as were Suffolk and Essex where there was a high incidence of ‘witches’.
